Home Contests The winners of Analytics of Partner Requests

The winners of Analytics of Partner Requests

by lerika

Four submissions for participation were sent in the Analytics of partner requests competition. In this article, we’ll take a look at the resources of all the winners.

1st place with an average score of 9.60 goes to Submission No. 2 (https://tonpartners.online/en).


This resource is well known to the community, it has been around for a long time and always contains up-to-date information about project partnerships. The information about partners is well structured and presented in chronological order, starting with the proposal, ending with the most recent KPI report.

For the contest, the tonpartners team developed a separate landing page, which accumulates all the information required its terms.

2nd place with an average score of 8.55 goes to Submission No. 1 (https://app.powerbi.com/)


The dashboard is made on Microsoft PowerBi and contains information on accepted and rejected partner offers.
All dashboard information is structured according to the terms of the competition.

There is a toolkit for tracking transfers of tokens received as part of the partnership. The developers named it “Eye of Sauron”. They claim they can even track transit wallets.


Some members of the jury noted that this resource can hardly be called complete, despite a large amount of relevant information. Others have lowered their scores for the dashboard’s low page speed.

3rd place with an average score of 8.00 goes to Submission No. 4 (https://tonpay.info/partners)


The resource has a very nice design and fast page loading speed. The information is structured according to the requirements of the competition.

Some members of the jury noticed that the website did not provide all information about partnerships: some lacked the requested budget or analytical reports. Despite this, all members of the jury agreed that this site has great potential.

4th place with an average score of 7.20 goes to Submission No. 3 (https://tonto.space/)


All members of the jury noted that this resource has a very well-thought-out structure and pleasant design. It is noteworthy that the tonto.space team used the infographic of the winner of the Identity competition.


Unfortunately, the information about partners on this site is not fully completed, there are not enough links, analytical reports and AMA sessions.

You may also like

Leave a Comment